[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: point-at-final-line
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: point-at-final-line |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jan 2018 05:32:08 +0200 |
> From: Emanuel Berg <moasen@zoho.com>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 03:18:18 +0100
>
> I don't know about that method. The reason is
> it seems to favor your suggestion. And not by
> a little! Here are the results in seconds for
> 10 000 runs in a buffer of 55 lines:
>
> ;; point-at-final-line-3 0.08
> ;; point-at-final-line-2 0.38
> ;; point-at-final-line-1 0.55
That's expected, but you should also make sure none of the methods
does some caching behind the scenes, because if some do, the cache
needs to be disabled or flushed between iterations.
- Re: point-at-final-line, (continued)
- Re: point-at-final-line, Stefan Monnier, 2018/01/28
- Message not available
- Re: point-at-final-line, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/28
- Re: point-at-final-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/28
- Message not available
- Re: point-at-final-line, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/29
- Re: point-at-final-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/29
- Message not available
- Re: point-at-final-line, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/29
- Re: point-at-final-line, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/01/29
- Message not available
- Re: point-at-final-line, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/29
- Re: point-at-final-line,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: point-at-final-line, Stefan Monnier, 2018/01/29
- Message not available
- Re: point-at-final-line, Emanuel Berg, 2018/01/30