[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DocView resolution for PDF on WQHD
From: |
Van L |
Subject: |
Re: DocView resolution for PDF on WQHD |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:26:40 +1000 |
> improve the Ghostscript rendering
Comparing A, B and C.
Emacs renders the S acceptably, see last word on line 6 of A.
But, there, the header and footer lines don’t render well.
The S in B also done in Emacs’s PDF viewer, isn’t as acceptable as in A.
Note, the staircasing on the double angle brackets. Line 3.
C is the native Mac app; maybe it adaptively renders depending on the size of
the window-frame.
C has not staircasing on those double angle brackets. Line 2.
Is it possible B’s S isn’t as good as A’s S because
B decides uses the font in the PDF and not those of the hosting platform?
Those double angle brackets in B and C. Choice of font issue, too?
—
A http://emacs.scratch.space/public/A.png
B http://emacs.scratch.space/public/B.png
C http://emacs.scratch.space/public/C.png