[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Do we need to bind to both RET and <return> variants?
From: |
Kaushal Modi |
Subject: |
Do we need to bind to both RET and <return> variants? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:09:22 -0500 |
Hello,
For the return key (for Emacs GUI) and the C-m variant RET (in nowindow
mode, terminal) to both work, should we be binding to both RET and <return>
variants?
I am sure that this issue comes up now and often, but I cannot find an
older thread with a definitive answer.
Recently this came up on Org mode thread. Earlier the <return> variant of
bindings were used, but then S-<return>, etc. did not work for a user using
Emacs in terminal mode, so the binding was changed to S-RET. But now ..
that doesn't work for Emacs GUI users :)
Ref: https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-orgmode/2019-01/msg00318.html
So what solution would make everyone happy?
--
Kaushal Modi
- Do we need to bind to both RET and <return> variants?,
Kaushal Modi <=