[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands
From: |
Glynn Clements |
Subject: |
Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Aug 2004 01:05:58 GMT |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity) |
Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> writes:
> "Paul D. Smith" <psmith@gnu.org> wrote in gnu.utils.help:
> > sb> I know that MAKE incorporates some work-alikes for bits of the
> > sb> UNIX shells,
> >
> >No it doesn't.
>
> Then I guess I'm hallucinating when I see commands "rm" to remove
> filenames.
No, you're seeing make running commands using the shell.
If you install GNU make on Windows, then try to process a Makefile
which uses "rm ...", you'll probably get an error along the lines of
"rm: command not found" (that's if you don't just get an error
regarding the shell not being found).
--
Glynn Clements <glynn.clements@virgin.net>
- make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Stephan Petersen, 2004/08/13
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Paul Jarc, 2004/08/13
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Stephan Petersen, 2004/08/16
- Message not available
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Stan Brown, 2004/08/21
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Paul D. Smith, 2004/08/28
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Stan Brown, 2004/08/28
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands,
Glynn Clements <=
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, mike burrell, 2004/08/28
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Stan Brown, 2004/08/29
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Paul D. Smith, 2004/08/29
- Re: make: how to selectively handle exit status of commands, Stan Brown, 2004/08/29