Re: [Help-gnucap] Settling time measurement for underdamped systems

[Seshadri V]

HI John,

I agree that I can specify an absolute value after defining my settling
time. But the problem is when you have a ringing output, you will cross the
desired absolute value specified multiple times before settling to the final
output. In that case, I wont know which time to take as the settling time. 

And like you said, I am creating a generic measurement and I expect it to
work for multiple cases such as damped response, undamped response.

Let me know if I misunderstood your suggestion :)

Thanks

Seshadri

John Griessen-3 wrote:
> 
> Seshadri V wrote:
> the simulator identifies only the first rising edge of the
>> output and the oscillations following the first overshoot are not
>> identified
>> by the simulator.
> 
> I bet you can tell gnucap to stop at an output absolute value and be right
> on the definition of settling
> time though.  Settling "time" would just be start to stop time.
> 
> Are you wanting to automate thousands of such runs?  It's easy to see
> running sims one at a time...
> 
> John
> (Gnucap newbie) -- I bet Al will have a more specific suggestion for
> settling time.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Help-gnucap mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnucap
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Settling-time-measurement-for-underdamped-systems-tp24506699p24510429.html
Sent from the Gnucap - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.