Re: ssl connection issues

[Michael Blumenkrantz]

On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:00:42 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:25:46 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz <address@hidden>
> said:
> 
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:12:54 +0200
> > Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > On 09/30/2010 09:32 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 2.10.2 fixes it! Excellent!  Is there any way that this async fix can be
> > > > backported to the 2.8 branch?  A very large portion of the EFL's users
> > > > rely on that branch and have not moved to 2.10 yet.
> > > 
> > > They are compatible so I think moving to 2.10 is pretty straight forward.
> > > 
> > > regards,
> > > Nikos
> > Indeed, however on platforms such as mobile or embedded, only the 2.8 series
> > may be available.
> 
> there is nothing u can do if all u have is 2.8 - u are stuck. the binary is
> already there. a backport would mean a rebuild and update/change of the
> shipped 2.8... and that would mean you can just as well move to 2.10 anyway
> with less work (is 2.10 doesnt break anything).
> 
> 
Ah, I thought that they had just been staying on that series.  Nevermind then!

-- 
Mike Blumenkrantz
Zentific: Our boolean values are huge.