[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: RSA sign/verify and hash generation functions
From: |
Murray S. Kucherawy |
Subject: |
RE: RSA sign/verify and hash generation functions |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 14:07:41 -0800 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Nikos
> Mavrogiannopoulos
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 12:32 PM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: RSA sign/verify and hash generation functions
>
> Yes. Aboutthe non gnutls_x509_* interface I have not fixed my mind
> yet since it appears to have side-effects. The current calls you
> describe is what will work anyway.
Tested against a current master, works fine. So right now my only calls to
gnutls_x509_*() are gnutls_x509_privkey_init() and
gnutls_x509_privkey_import(). Hash signing and verifying and all public key
operations are now using the more generic (i.e., gnutls_privkey_*() and
gnutls_pubkey_*()) interfaces.
-MSK