[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mangling Stdcall and GCC
|
From: |
Paul Pluzhnikov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Mangling Stdcall and GCC |
|
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 07:28:30 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux) |
address@hidden writes:
> I think the attribute '__stdcall'
The __stdcall doesn't have *anything* to do with name mangling.
> and the '.def' file using remove the
> mangling of function, but it isn't. :(
The .def file can't possibly affect name mangling -- by the time
.def file comes into play (at link time), the object has already
been compiled and the mangling has already happened.
> . How can i remove the whole
> (address@hidden and address@hidden) function mangling??
extern "C" int ExtFunz(int a) { ... }
Cheers,
--
In order to understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Remove /-nsp/ for email.