[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: icedtea update graft failure
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: icedtea update graft failure |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 02:44:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:53:50AM -0400, Ethan Stefan Day wrote:
> I just tried to upgrade my GuixSD x86_64 system and it failed saying:
>
> grafting '/gnu/store/z7qr06vxqkqr983sarh50d4p8m45b51z-icedtea-3.1.0-doc'
> -> '/gnu/store/0minmdl1fgh96xakpgp73mwh4qcjvvs4-icedtea-3.1.0-doc'...
> grafting '/gnu/store/3ldp9zinsnzr9jmacrjk1j4y39cydrpf-icedtea-3.1.0-jdk'
> -> '/gnu/store/gfj39lzp301pf2ny51c5lz48mykaf07r-icedtea-3.1.0-jdk'...
> grafting '/gnu/store/c23hqrmzsd4k9a13nyrmvmimqf5pfjbn-icedtea-3.1.0' ->
> '/gnu/store/g5bn1xbaqs4h30x4n0ggrhabh11winwf-icedtea-3.1.0'...
> suspicious ownership or permission on
> `/gnu/store/0minmdl1fgh96xakpgp73mwh4qcjvvs4-icedtea-3.1.0-doc';
> rejecting this build output
> cannot build derivation
> `/gnu/store/m2p785lr8m6j4qzkrly05w1nxxiavkjx-profile.drv': 1
> dependencies couldn't be built
It looks like bug 23452:
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23452#13
> I updated icedtea successfully using the --no-grafts option. Is this
> the sort of thing I should bring up or just ignore?
Try doing the operation again. The bug does not manifest
deterministically, so everything usually works the second time.
Please, don't use --no-grafts. You will not receive any security updates
that we've grafted onto core packages.
For more information, read section 7.4 Security Updates of the manual:
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Security-Updates.html#Security-Updates
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature