[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles)
From: |
Richard Kreuter |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles) |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:30:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.27i |
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 12:02:16AM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 05:43:09PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 09:36:02PM +0100, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 03:31:16PM -0500, Richard Kreuter wrote:
> > > > I assume I'm using the term 'bootstrap filesystem' correctly
> > > > here. Is this term acceptable for policy use?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure it's better than "root filesystem".
> >
> > Sometimes <Richard Kreuter writes too much about ambiguity>
>
> Still bootstrap filesystem has the same problem. The problem lies in
> the the word filesystem. What about "root partition/store" and "root
> directory"?
You're right. Then should we say something like "Creation of
files on the root partition is discouraged" or similar?
New, little stuff:
For the GNU annex: several utilities are required for boot or
restoration of GNU/Hurd, and so should be required in /bin: settrans,
showtrans, fsysopts, devprobe, others?
Richard
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), (continued)
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Kenneth Stailey, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/17
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles),
Richard Kreuter <=
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Richard Kreuter, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Ian Duggan, 2002/03/18
- Re: Hurd FS hierarchy (was Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH troubles), Jeroen Dekkers, 2002/03/18