[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: weird PATH_MAX discussion in mplayer's list. (Fwd: [MPlayer-dev-eng]
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: weird PATH_MAX discussion in mplayer's list. (Fwd: [MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] fix for unconditional use of PATH_MAX) |
Date: |
Thu, 1 May 2003 14:53:22 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:45:30PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> If the maintainer says that he doesn't want the patch then I don't see
> why one should waste efforts on such tasks, no matter how flawed and
> wrong arguments he has. It would be better to have an third party
> patch (yes, I know that idea sucks).
Better in the loosest sense. If the magical time comes when we're
actually usable on people's desktops, they will scream at the
maintainers directly. I suspect they won't come hunting after the folks
maintaining the Hurd (and the port) itself.
And if someone does, I'll feed them to the fires of /dev/null =)
--
You said homosexuals form a small percentage of the population. So
do Jews. Is that a reason to deny someone equality?
- Richard Marceau
Re: weird PATH_MAX discussion in mplayer's list. (Fwd: [MPlayer-dev-eng] [PATCH] fix for unconditional use of PATH_MAX), Marcus Brinkmann, 2003/05/02