[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: forcing a rule
From: |
Boris Kolpackov |
Subject: |
Re: forcing a rule |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Apr 2004 15:16:15 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
Hi Paul,
> It would break any makefile that needed a literal "$" in the
> prerequisites list. Whether that is significant or not I don't know.
> It seems unlikely but then again make runs on lots of different
> platforms, and works with programs that have lots of different naming
> conventions.
This is true but than, $$@ is not an absolutely backward compatible
feature either ;-).
I was thinking about establishing a generic mechanism for handling
such new features about which I give my thoughts in this thread
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/help-make/2004-03/msg00105.html
I would really appreciate it if you could comment on that.
thanks,
-boris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), (continued)
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/02
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/02
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/02
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/02
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/02
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/04
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/14
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/14
- Re: MAKEFLAGS (Was: forcing a rule), Noel Yap, 2004/04/14
- Re: forcing a rule, Paul D. Smith, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule,
Boris Kolpackov <=
- Re: forcing a rule, Paul D. Smith, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/04
- Re: forcing a rule, Noel Yap, 2004/04/14
- Re: forcing a rule, Boris Kolpackov, 2004/04/14