[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: is this list active
From: |
John Graham-Cumming |
Subject: |
Re: is this list active |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:32:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040208 Thunderbird/0.5 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 |
PATTON, BILLY (SBCSI) wrote:
I'm in need of some technical help solving some makefile problems.
Mostly in reductions of # of lines by using define and calls; I'm
expecting my finished makefile to be 7k+ lines long and include another
40k+ lines into it. These are generated by a perl script making use of
a lot of loops. I could do everything by "flattening" everything but
that would be a maintenance nightmare. After the product has passed
testing the Makefile and all 500+ make.include files will be static and
put into version control.
Is this list ok to ask questions or do I continue to use
comp.unix.programmer?
Ask away. This is an active list.
(Of course, if you'd like a paid consultant on this I'd be interested :-)
John.
--
John Graham-Cumming
address@hidden
Home: http://www.jgc.org/
Blog: http://www.jgc.org/blog/
POPFile: http://getpopfile.org/
GNU Make Standard Library: http://gmsl.sf.net/
GNU Make Debugger: http://gmd.sf.net/
Fast, Parallel Builds: http://www.electric-cloud.com/
Sign up for my Spam and Anti-spam Newsletter
at http://www.jgc.org/
- is this list active, PATTON, BILLY \(SBCSI\), 2006/03/15
- Re: is this list active,
John Graham-Cumming <=