Re: -j 2 exposes problem with pattern rule

[John Breitenbach]

Paul Smith wrote:
> If that's not what you want, then you'll have to define the rule
> four times:
>
>     lf/%:
>             do_stuff()
>     af/%:
>             do_stuff()
>     nf/%:
>             do_stuff()
>     pf/%:
>             do_stuff()
>
> Read about pattern rules in the GNU make manual.
Paul - thanks - yes, your suggestion above is exactly what I needed (and 
indended).  Not observing
any problems w/o -j 1 got me looking in the wrong places.