help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

http://www.agner.org/random/ vs. octave_rand::scalar()


From: Steve C. Thompson
Subject: http://www.agner.org/random/ vs. octave_rand::scalar()
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:09:28 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i

Group,

I've ran my test (described at http://elsteve.com/test_oct/index.html#bpsk_ber)
with the random number generator from http://www.agner.org/random/ and
found a speed improvement.  It now takes 8.25 minutes to run which is
nearly twice as fast as when I used octave_rand::scalar() and about 40%
faster than the pure m-file approach.

http://www.agner.org/random/ is GPL'd.

Thanks,
Steve



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]