Re: retaining interpreter when running script from command line

[John W. Eaton]

On  3-Mar-2005, E. Joshua Rigler <address@hidden> wrote:

| This option does what I *said* I wanted, but it is not what I actually
| need ;^).  If I use --funcall, I have to find some way to pass any
| variables I might set in FUNC back to the interpreter.  I can think of
| no good way to do this.

Yes, after I sent my previous message, I thought that might be what you
really wanted.

It would not be hard to add an option like

  octave --eval "arbitrary-code"

but if we do this, do we also need --funcall?

jwe



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------