[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave to matlab conversion
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: octave to matlab conversion |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Oct 2005 11:10:58 -0500 (CDT) |
On Sat, 8 Oct 2005, Julius Smith wrote:
I never have any problems with "inconsistencies" in Matlab syntax, so
how bad could they be? Also, what's so bad, from a users's perspective,
about being a "vectorized Fortran"?
Tom -- Any response to either of those comments? I also wonder what
inconsistencies you can point out. You wrote, "ML's syntax is
inconsistent, awkward, and frankly Fortran-like (no mystery there)."
What is bad about being "Fortran-like?" I'm asking about these things
because I don't know.
Mike
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: octave to matlab conversion, (continued)
Re: octave to matlab conversion, Paul Kienzle, 2005/10/06
Re: octave to matlab conversion, Zdenek Hurak, 2005/10/07