Re: new octave

[Robert A. Macy]

OOPS!

Accept all three [is there any reason not to?], prefer the
first, Matlab-like.

                     - Robert -

On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:53:43 +0000
 "Hugo Silva" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am writing a "new octave" program with many differences
> from Matlab/Octave
> syntax.
> 
> Matlab uses three dots (...) to tell to continue the
> command on the next
> line. I would like to know your opinion about other
> solution than the three
> dots (...).
> 
> Below is an example of a m file with three options. Tell
> me which one you
> like more, or tell me about any better idea.
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> function res=myFunc(src)
> 
> %option 1 (like matlab)
> 
> filter= ...
> 
> [ ...
> 
> -100,200,-100 ...
> 
> ]
> 
> % option 2 (like tcl)
> 
> filter= \
> 
> [ \
> 
> -100,200,-100 \
> 
> ]
> 
> % option 3 (using {})
> 
> {
> 
> filter=
> 
> [
> 
> -100,200,-100
> 
> ]
> 
> }
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Hugo



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------

vailable under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------