[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave and NAG
From: |
Kevin H. Hobbs |
Subject: |
Re: octave and NAG |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:19:47 -0500 |
On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 13:28 +0200, Gorazd Brumen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody have experience with using octave and NAG fortran or c
> libraries (NAG = numerical algorithms group)? Can he share his
> experience with us?
>
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Gorazd
>
>
Depending on what you mean, Yes. I've had experience with octave and the
NAG C libraries. If you mean some Frankenstein build of octave with NAG
then, no I've only used them as separate projects. When I used NAG I
was tormented by their documentation. I switched to the GNU Science
Library ( GSL ) which does almost everything NAG does but also has
understandable documentation. Somehow combining octave and GSL seems
very sane, wrapper functions and such. Their both GPL at least.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- octave and NAG, Gorazd Brumen, 2006/03/28
- Re: octave and NAG,
Kevin H. Hobbs <=
- octave and gsl, Gorazd Brumen, 2006/03/29
- octave and gsl, John W. Eaton, 2006/03/29
- Re: octave and gsl, Stefan van der Walt, 2006/03/29
- Re: octave and gsl, Paul Kienzle, 2006/03/29
- Re: octave and gsl, Gorazd Brumen, 2006/03/29
- Re: octave and gsl, Paul Kienzle, 2006/03/29
- Re: octave and gsl, James R. Phillips, 2006/03/29