[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A question on Matlab compatibility
From: |
David Bateman |
Subject: |
Re: A question on Matlab compatibility |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:24:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060817) |
Ron Crummett wrote:
> I get the impression that I have stirred the pot some with my queries
> and I apologize for doing so. That which has been identified as
> complaining was not intended as such, but rather inquisitions as to why
> some things have been done the way they have, and what it might take to
> bring Octave more in line with Matlab compatibility from my
> perspective. Apparently, my perspective takes a much narrower view than
> most others; I am more concerned about the cosmetics and assume
> functionality is sufficient, whereas most others have a greater concern
> about the functionality as well. But I suppose painting the car won't
> make it run any better.
>
> That being said, I am very interested (as always) in helping toward the
> greater improvement of Octave. I just don't want to step on anyone's
> toes by reworking something that they have done because I think it needs
> some improvement, unless I know that all parties involved are okay with
> that. From this discussion, I have gathered that such is permissible.
>
> -Ron
Hey, this is perhaps one of the most open and polite group of
open-source developers out there. No one is going to jump on you if you
contribute code. They might tell you how to improve it though :-)
D.
- A question on Matlab compatibility, Ron Crummett, 2006/09/15
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, A. Scottedward Hodel, 2006/09/15
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, Ron Crummett, 2006/09/16
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, Joe Koski, 2006/09/16
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, Ron Crummett, 2006/09/17
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, David Bateman, 2006/09/17
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/17
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, Ron Crummett, 2006/09/17
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility,
David Bateman <=
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, Peter Jensen, 2006/09/17
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, David Bateman, 2006/09/17
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, Paul Kienzle, 2006/09/17
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, Paul Kienzle, 2006/09/17
- Re: A question on Matlab compatibility, John W. Eaton, 2006/09/17