[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.1 branch vs. 2.9 branch

From: Rafael Laboissiere
Subject: Re: 2.1 branch vs. 2.9 branch
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 20:05:43 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

* Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso <address@hidden> [2006-11-06 06:57]:

> On 03/11/06, Ronald Crummett <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 2.  I do recall reading, once, that many of the Octave-Forge functions
> > have been incorporated into the 2.9 branch - but not all, right?  So if
> > I install a 2.9.x version I would still need to install Octave-Forge -
> > but would doing so override some of the functions included in Octave?
> Don't quote me on this, [...]

Sorry, I am going to...

> [...] but I believe the Debian Octave team backports some of the 'forge
> functions to the 2.1 branch in their octave2.1-forge package:

This is not completely accurate.  The octave2.1-forge package is built from
the 2006.03.17 tarball, while the octave2.9-forge package is based on the
2006.07.09 tarball.  There is no backport of this last tarball for
octave2.1, and there will never be.

Rafael, on behalf of the DOG

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]