On 23-Oct-2007, Ben Abbott wrote:
| The 1st failure, from fntest.log ...
|
| -----------------------
| >>>>> processing /Users/bpabbott/src/octave/07.10.12/scripts/
testfun/
| test.m
| ***** xtest error("This test is known to fail")
| !!!!! known failure
| error: This test is known to fail
| >>>>> processing /Users/bpabbott/src/octave/07.10.12/scripts/time/
| calendar.m
| >>>>> processing /Users/bpabbott/src/octave/07.10.12/scripts/time/
| datenum.m
| >>>>> processing /Users/bpabbott/src/octave/07.10.12/scripts/time/
| datestr.m
| >>>>> processing /Users/bpabbott/src/octave/07.10.12/scripts/time/
| datevec.m
| ***** assert(datevec("09/13"),[nowvec(1),9,13,0,0,0]);
| !!!!! test failed
| error: assert (datevec ("09/13"),[nowvec(1), 9, 13, 0, 0, 0])
expected
| 2007 9 13 0 0 0
| but got
| 2000 9 13 0 0 0
| values do not match
| shared variables {
| nowvec =
|
| 2007.0000 10.0000 23.0000 22.0000 2.0000
| 26.8259
|
| }
| -----------------------
|
| This appears to be expected. The second failure from fntest.log ...
|
| -----------------------
| >>>>> processing test_sparse
| ***** assert(as./bs,sparse(af./bf,true),100*eps);
| !!!!! test failed
| error: assert (as ./ bs,sparse (af ./ bf, true),100 * eps) expected
| Inf + Infi 2 - 1i NaN - NaNi NaN - NaNi
| 0 + 0i NaN - NaNi NaN - NaNi Inf + Infi
| 0 + 0i 0 + 0i NaN - NaNi Inf - NaNi
| but got
| NaN - NaNi 2 - 1i NaN - NaNi NaN - NaNi
| 0 + 0i NaN - NaNi NaN - NaNi NaN - NaNi
| 0 + 0i 0 + 0i NaN - NaNi NaN - NaNi
| NaNs don't match
| -----------------------
|
| I noticed the following message after running "make test"
|
| -----------------------
| Summary:
|
| PASS 3731
| FAIL 2
|
| There were 3 expected failures (see fntests.log for details).
| -----------------------
|
| So there are "3 expected failures" and I only have 2 ... I assume 1
| or more of these expected failures have been corrected?
|
| In any event, is the failure I've encountered expected?
The sparse problem is currently under discussion here:
https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/bug-octave/2007-October/
003596.html
The datevec problem is currently under discussion here:
https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/bug-octave/2007-October/
003515.html
I'd guess that you missed the other expected failures. They are in
ismember.m
jwe