|
From: | cal |
Subject: | Re: 20 GB console.log documents generated |
Date: | Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:52:42 -0600 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Macintosh/20070728) |
Here it the code I was using. %% test the time it takes to create a 20k point sine wave an to plot it. clear clf tic T = 0 : 0.0001 : 2 - .0001; Y = 2.3*sin(2*pi*10*T); toc plot(T,Y) toc Cal Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote: On 29/10/2007, Cal <address@hidden> wrote:I can send the code when I get home to my machine there. I work on MatLab at work and often work with huge files, 10^6 points or so.Working with huge files is different from plotting that many points. My current guess is that since Octave communicates with gnuplot through pipes and temporary files (or has this changed?), you had to send a ridiculously large amount of data to gnuplot. I am guessing that MacOS X's console must log this information somewhere, accounting for the huge logs, but I don't know anything useful about MacOS X, so I could be wrong.But I also wanted to compare how long it took octave to perform the task versus scilab.What was the task, exactly? I'll wait until you can show us the code.P.S. I forgot to CC help-octave in my reply sorry for duplicating to youYes, thanks for remembering to keep the conversation on list so that others may participate. If I could further kindly request that you do not top-post replies to me (top-posted replies look really horrible in the mailing list archives), I'd be grateful. Cheers, - Jordi G. H. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |