[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Quick question about oct files and OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER
From: |
john.2.tomlinson |
Subject: |
RE: Quick question about oct files and OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 11:21:03 +0100 |
David
Sorry - yes I am using C++. So I will not worry about freeing the
memory.
Thanks for the very quick reply.
John T.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Bateman [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 29 August 2008 11:11
To: Tomlinson,J,John,DMJ R
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Quick question about oct files and OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER
address@hidden wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> I am working on some code that is written in 'C' and calling this code
> from Octave. Within the 'C' code I am allocating memory using
> OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER. Can the group just confirm that I do not need to
> do anything to free this memory when the function finishes?
>
> Sorry for the rather newbie question - I get a little nervous not
> freeing memory after programming 'C/C++' for 15 years.
>
> John Tomlinson.
> Ipswich, UK
>
In C++ it typically uses the std::vector<T> class for allocation of the
memory and yes in C++ when the variable goes out of scope it will be
deleted. However, in C you can't use OCTAVE_LOCAL_BUFFER. Do you mean
you are using C++ and not C?
D.
--
David Bateman address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary