[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: strange for .. end syntax or bug?
From: |
Carlo de Falco |
Subject: |
Re: strange for .. end syntax or bug? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:54:29 +0100 |
On 27/set/08, at 09:37, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
In 3.0.1 I get a case where 'end' and 'endfor' behave differently:
octave> for i=1:2 for j=3:4 disp([i j]) end end
parse error:
syntax error
for i=1:2 for j=3:4 disp([i j]) end end
^
I think this is normal, correct syntax would be
>> for i=1:2 for j=3:4 disp([i j]); end; end
1 3
1 4
2 3
2 4
which works fine
octave> for i=1:2 for j=3:4 disp([i j]) endfor endfor
1 3
1 4
2 3
2 4
I'm surprised this works...
Is this normal?
c.