|
From: | Divakar Ramachandran |
Subject: | Re: Catching up to Matlab |
Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 2010 23:18:15 +0530 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 |
On 18/11/2010 02:17, Jaroslav Hajek wrote: > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> wrote: >> >> >> --- On Sun, 11/14/10, Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> wrote: >> >>> From: Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> >>> Subject: Re: Catching up to Matlab >>> To: "Sergei Steshenko" <address@hidden> >>> Cc: "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>, address@hidden >>> Date: Sunday, November 14, 2010, 11:55 AM >>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:01 PM, >>> Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> --- On Tue, 11/2/10, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> From: John W. Eaton <address@hidden> >>>>> Subject: Re: Catching up to Matlab >>>>> To: "Sergei Steshenko" <address@hidden> >>>>> Cc: "Judd Storrs" <address@hidden>, >>> address@hidden >>>>> Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 8:33 AM >>>>> On 2-Nov-2010, Sergei Steshenko >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> | I am seriously considering volunteering, but >>> _my_ way. >>>>> The idea is >>>>> | trivially simple: >>>>> | >>>>> | to modify 'octave' built-in 'help' function in a >>> manner >>>>> it will in >>>>> | addition to displaying 'octave' built-in >>> documentation >>>>> will display >>>>> | the corresponding Matlab documentation by >>> invoking WEB >>>>> browser with >>>>> | URL pointing to Matlab documentation of the >>> same >>>>> function. >>>>> >>>>> You are free to do what you like with the help >>> function >>>>> (subject to >>>>> the terms of the GPL) but I don't think a patch >>> like you >>>>> describe will >>>>> be accepted as part of Octave. I certainly would >>> not >>>>> apply it, and >>>>> would likely remove it if someone else did. >>>>> >>>>> jwe >>>>> >>>> >>>> I didn't expect any other answer :). >>>> >>> >>> You would be quite naive if you did. Why on Earth should >>> Octave want >>> such a thing? >>> >> >> Because Octave _users_ need _good_ documentation and can't care less about >> the developers' ideological objections to providing a link. >> FWIW, I would vote against including Matlab links even though I am just a normal user who has never contributed (so far) to Octave and just am using it for my work instead of Matlab, and am at times quite lost when "Octaving". If ever I do need more help from Matlab website, I do know how to access that information without having Octave provide me a link. Providing a link to Matlab documentation seems a bit like stealing their documentation. As a community we should be able to generate the documentation required. Moreover, providing a link as proposed above presumes that Octave is just a freebie copy of Matlab, which I think it is not, nor should it be. -- Just my two cents or its equivalent in Indian Rupees. Divakar > > And the developers can't care less about users' "needs", right? > > _______________________________________________ > Help-octave mailing list > address@hidden > https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/help-octave > |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |