[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: optimizing error: undefined argument
From: |
DGati |
Subject: |
Re: optimizing error: undefined argument |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Aug 2011 06:17:16 -0700 (PDT) |
Doug Stewart-4 wrote:
>
>
> To use your function you must pass a number to it like:
>
> func(6)
>
> or
>
> w=6
> func(w)
>
> this will not give an error, But
>
> func
> will give the error that you are seeing.
>
>
> Doug
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
Yes, but if I try minimizing a function or maximizing it, I shouldn't pass
it a number since I don't know at which value the function will be minimal.
This is exactly the point.
minimize(func, x) is the syntax to 'minimize', where x is the list of
arguments to func (in this case, only one). Surely I wouldn't need to pass a
number for x?
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/optimizing-error-undefined-argument-tp3746683p3747164.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.