[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: named arguments
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: named arguments |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:34:40 -0400 |
On 16 March 2012 07:53, Olaf Till <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm not aware of Octave supporting named arguments. There was once a
> suggestion to support named arguments, but it has been disapproved
> because of the risk of future incompatibilities with Matlab.
I wish we could fix this. Named arguments are a huge convenience. Can
you think of something better than this?
http://abandonmatlab.wordpress.com/2009/07/31/no-named-arguments/
- Jordi G. H.
- named arguments, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Olaf Till, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Michael Goffioul, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: named arguments, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Olaf Till, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, John W. Eaton, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, John W. Eaton, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Michael Goffioul, 2012/03/16
- RE: named arguments, Damian Harty, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, fork, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, John W. Eaton, 2012/03/16