[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Julia
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: Julia |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:04:31 -0700 (PDT) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, April 2, 2012 6:26 PM
> Subject: Julia
>
> Continuing with a comment from Carlo about this new language Julia
>
> http://www.johnmyleswhite.com/notebook/2012/03/31/julia-i-love-you/
>
> It is a pity that they use ML as reference instead of Octave...
>
> --
> M. Sc. Juan Pablo Carbajal
> -----
> PhD Student
> University of Zürich
> http://ailab.ifi.uzh.ch/carbajal/
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
How/why does it matter (MatLab <-> Octave) in this case ?
Reading http://julialang.org/ I see that in the benchmarks Matlab is faster. As
languages Matlab and Octave are very similar.
Regards,
Sergei.
- Julia, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2012/04/02
- Re: Julia,
Sergei Steshenko <=