help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check


From: Ed Meyer
Subject: Re: Interpreting Results of Make Check
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:40:23 -0700



On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Feuerbacher, Alan <address@hidden> wrote:
Ed Meyer wrote:

> . . . and send the file named 'diary' on the working directory. In addition to the OS you might
add what version of octave


Compiling octave-3.6.3

OS information:
  OS: GNU/Linux  and Redhat5
  Platform: x86-64
  Kernel: 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5
  Machine: Dell T7500 2 6-core Xeon processors

Using the latest or nearly latest versions of gcc, glibc, binutils, etc., loosely following the latest LinuxFromScratch (LFS) guidelines adapted to RHEL5.

Output of:

octave:1> diary
octave:2> test fftfilt

##############################
octave:2> test fftfilt
  ***** test
  b = [1 1];
  x = [1, zeros(1,9)];
 assert (fftfilt (b,  x  ), [1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]  );
 assert (fftfilt (b,  x.'), [1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0].');
 assert (fftfilt (b.',x  ), [1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]  );
 assert (fftfilt (b.',x.'), [1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0].');
!!!!! test failed
assert (fftfilt (b, x),[1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]) expected
   1   1   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0
but got
   1.00000   1.00000   0.00000  -0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000   0.00000
values do not match
shared variables
  scalar structure containing the fields:

    b = [](0x0)
    x = [](0x0)
    r = [](0x0)
octave:3> quit
##############################

Thanks again!
Alan


This looks like one for Dan - aren't these supposed to be coming out integer?  That's why
you took off the eps arg, right?

--
Ed Meyer


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]