[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Boost libraries

From: Olaf Till
Subject: Re: Boost libraries
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 10:52:45 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:45:17PM -0400, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 18:56 +0200, JuanPi wrote:
> > What is the general opinion about using boost libraires?
> > 
> >
> Generally a good idea. Boost is C++'s second standard library. Indeed,
> a lot of namespace std today started its life in namespace boost.

But then, have we to include two license texts (Boost and GPL) into
source files linking to boost or including boost (since this probably
counts as a derivative work also of boost)?


public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]