i have a RedHat account. if you tell me how, i’ll submit the bug report.
On Mar 2, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Ozzy Lash <address@hidden> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Mike Miller <address@hidden> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:45:31 -0800, Michael Metts wrote:
> ha! awesome. i’m down to just the Sundials issue now. so, Mike,
> should i switch to the build you recommended or is it okay
> (reasonable) to continue with the dev build from the hg repo?
I would say that unless you have a reason to use the dev version, you
should be using 4.2.1. And coincidentally the sundials support is not in
the 4.2 branch, so that warning will go away.
If you want to volunteer some time to help the devs figure out why the
sundials detection is not working on your system, I'm sure it would be
appreciated, but if you just want a working Octave, go with 4.2.1.
--
mike
It looks like the sundials package for epel does not build with KLU support. I could submit a bug report for it, although I don't have a redhat bugzilla account, so I would need to create one. It looks like it will pull in a dependency on the suitesparse-devel package (I was able to compile it with KLU support in centos 7.3, but couldn't build an rpm because there are dependency issues with openmpi right now on centos7.3).