[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety

From: stefan
Subject: Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 17:09:30 +0100 (CET)

On 10 Dec 2002, Andreas Rottmann wrote:

> > > > As I already stated:  If ever -> then a wrapper API, because this what
> > > > Serveez is mostly about: system independence.
> > > >
> > > Hmm, one could argue POSIX is also about system independence ;-)
> >
> > But POSIX isn't implemented for all of them...  Of course for the most
> > common ones it actually is.
> >
> Are there any real systems _with_ _thread_ _support_ that don't have a
> pthread implementation?
> But I guess your point is that with a wrapper, it would be possible to
> use *exactly* the same code, even if there are no pthreads (the mutex
> operations, then would become simply null code). ACK?

Correct.  Also I would implement the necessary changes for windoze without
using a 3rd party library (as Raimi proposed).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]