[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety
From: |
stefan |
Subject: |
Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Dec 2002 08:25:19 +0100 (CET) |
On 11 Dec 2002, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> You seem to contradict yourself. I read the above as "it doesn't
> really make sense to layer ontop of pthreads", which contradicts your
> following statements:
> [...]
> Could you clear this up?
I agree doing that:
* introduce a --enable-threads 'configure' argument, which (for a first
step) looks for a -lpthread library
* if enabled *and* found we can use the mutices in th pthread
implementation
* these pthread funtions go into wrapper like svz_mutex_*()
* the svz_mutex_() functions will be empty if there is no pthread found
*or* disabled
Does this make sense now?
Cheers,
address@hidden
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, (continued)
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, Andreas Rottmann, 2002/12/08
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, stefan, 2002/12/10
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, Andreas Rottmann, 2002/12/10
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, stefan, 2002/12/10
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, Andreas Rottmann, 2002/12/10
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, stefan, 2002/12/11
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, Raimund 'Raimi' Jacob, 2002/12/10
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, Andreas Rottmann, 2002/12/11
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, stefan, 2002/12/11
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, Andreas Rottmann, 2002/12/11
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety,
stefan <=
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, Raimund 'Raimi' Jacob, 2002/12/12
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, stefan, 2002/12/12
- Re: [help-serveez] Thread safety, Andreas Rottmann, 2002/12/13