[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: partition store
From: |
Neal H Walfield |
Subject: |
Re: partition store |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2001 02:06:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
> > Most of it. However, it has the potential to be quite small and I am
> > currently working with the maintainer to redesign it so that the
> > interobject dependencies are decreased.
>
> Hmm. I hope that happens soon.
Well, you are going to have to give me at least a week.
> > My experience has been that I need to expicitly link against libparted
> > and all libraries that libparted depends on (currently, only one).
> > Which is to say, just linking against libstore will not bring in the
> > libraries that libstore depends on. Am I doing something wrong?
>
> That should certainly not be the case; if it were, then every program on
> the system would need -lmachuser -lhurduser. Please check everything
> (especially that you are properly getting the DT_NEEDED into libstore.so)
> and report the details if this is really happening.
You are correct, the DT_NEEDED was not being added to libstore. Now,
the question is, how do I get it in. When building libraries, OTHERLIBS
is not being used. Should I do LDFLAGS += -lparted?
pgpyHEgbPM34Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- partition store, Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/24
- Re: partition store, Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/24
- Re: partition store, Roland McGrath, 2001/08/24
- Re: partition store, Roland McGrath, 2001/08/24
- Re: partition store, Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/25
- Re: partition store, Roland McGrath, 2001/08/25
- Re: partition store, Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/25
- Re: partition store, Roland McGrath, 2001/08/25
- Re: partition store, Neal H Walfield, 2001/08/25
- Re: partition store, Roland McGrath, 2001/08/25