|
From: | Roland McGrath |
Subject: | Re: store_set_size |
Date: | Tue, 3 Dec 2002 16:47:09 -0500 (EST) |
Hmm. Stores were never really conceived of as variable-sized things. I think we always figured a tarfs would just use an underlying Hurd file directly and so have file_set_size et al available to it.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |