[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects
From: |
Marcus Brinkmann |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2002 03:16:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 05:08:12PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > I think that's the way to go. create_proxy should always resolve the
> > nested objects to a linear list of real memory objects with protection
> > and ranges.
>
> Definitely.
>
> > Well, so far there is no offset argument ;) but something like "start = -1"
> > and "size" being the size of the hole _would_ be possible, although it is
> > certainly a horrible kludge.
>
> I goofy but straightforward and general interface is better than a limited
> one like your other suggestion (one hole).
Is that a (however reluctant) ok for the "MACH_PORT_NULL; -1; size" proposal?
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' GNU http://www.gnu.org address@hidden
Marcus Brinkmann The Hurd http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/
address@hidden
http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de/
- [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/03
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/12/12
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Roland McGrath, 2002/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects,
Marcus Brinkmann <=
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Roland McGrath, 2002/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/15
Re: [PATCH] proxy memory objects, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/12/13