Re: customizing coverage

[Thien-Thi Nguyen]

() address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès)
() Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:17:51 +0100

   So presumably, what you show above shouldn’t interfere badly, and in
   fact shouldn’t make any difference.

Good.

Is that URL stable?  I'd like to add a blurb in HACKING re "how to
add --enable-coverage to configure" (unless you beat me to it).

   > - If so, is that syntax correct?  Is there a better way to append?

   There are 1 problem: ‘meta.configureFlags’ means “get the attribute
   named ‘configureFlags’ from the attribute set stored in the
   lexically-scoped variable ‘meta’.”  And ‘meta’ has no such field.  So
   instead, it should be:

     configureFlags = configureFlags + " --enable-coverage";

   Note that ‘+’ is like ‘string-append’.

Oops, i mistook the scope of ‘configureFlags’.
Thanks for the correction.

It seems to me ‘X = TRANSFORM (X)’ is like the binding clause of a
‘let’ binding block, rather than that of ‘let*’.  Do i misunderstand?