[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: failure emails assume nixpkgs changes are to blame
|
From: |
Glenn Morris |
|
Subject: |
Re: failure emails assume nixpkgs changes are to blame |
|
Date: |
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:13:51 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Under the assumption that build processes are deterministic, it just
> lists all the committers to Emacs and/or Nixpkgs between the
> last-known-good build and the failed build.
But it doesn't, it only lists the Nixpkgs ones, that's my point.
Eg see the input changes in http://hydra.nixos.org/build/6758185 .
There were changes in emacs and nixpkgs, but only the nixpkg committer
gets singled out for blame in the buildstatus email:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-buildstatus/2013-11/msg00000.html
Same story with http://hydra.nixos.org/build/6817782 and
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-buildstatus/2013-11/msg00011.html