[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [igraph] Speed comparison of R and C
From: |
Minh Nguyen |
Subject: |
Re: [igraph] Speed comparison of R and C |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Feb 2011 18:45:48 +1100 |
Hi William,
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:43 AM, William Tu <address@hidden> wrote:
> However, in the mailing list, it seems
> most people are using python or R, and there are few discussions and
> docs about igraph in C. So I'm still hesitating.
It's a matter of making a trade-off between ease of use and runtime
efficiency. Python and R should be easy to pick up if you have
programming experience. And these two languages are not as difficult
as C for those who are starting to learn programming. Of course if
you're still concerned about speed, and you have a need for speed but
still don't want to do C programming, try using Cython [1] to
interface the C library of igraph with Python.
[1] http://www.cython.org
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
- [igraph] Speed comparison of R and C, William Tu, 2011/02/07
- Re: [igraph] Speed comparison of R and C, William Tu, 2011/02/08
- Re: [igraph] Speed comparison of R and C, William Tu, 2011/02/08
- Re: [igraph] Speed comparison of R and C, Tamás Nepusz, 2011/02/08
- Re: [igraph] Speed comparison of R and C, Gábor Csárdi, 2011/02/08
- RE: [igraph] Speed comparison of R and C, jeremy.raw, 2011/02/09
- [igraph] Bipartitle community detection, Liang Wang, 2011/02/09
- Re: [igraph] Bipartitle community detection, Tamás Nepusz, 2011/02/10