[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [igraph] igraph_degree(), seriously?
From: |
Marco |
Subject: |
Re: [igraph] igraph_degree(), seriously? |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:14:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20110307 Icedove/3.0.11 |
On 04/20/2011 09:10 PM, Tamás Nepusz wrote:
Hi Tamas,
You're right, this is pretty complicated. We haven't really considered this a
nuisance so far because we are mostly using igraph from R or Python where all
this complexity is hidden behind the scenes. I'll add an extra function called
igraph_degree_1 or something like that which would act as a shortcut. (I was
thinking about igraph_degree_1 for the name because this rhymes well with
igraph_vss_1, igraph_ess_1 and such).
The name sounds very good: it makes sense and, as you say, rhymes well.
Do you have any other functions which you use frequently and which would
benefit from a similar simplification?
As of now I still don't know, but if something comes up while I am
writing this code (you may have noticed I switched from python to C:
this is to gain speed on non-igraph-related functions) I will write a
(shorter) email.
Thank you,
marco