[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why??
From: |
Mike Castle |
Subject: |
Re: must "cvs update" before "cvs commit", why?? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 08:22:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.6i |
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:26:34AM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> This is really strange: often some changed files won't be committed
> unless I perform a general "cvs update" (where this changed files appear
> as M). After the update the "cvs commit" works fine. And FWIW I am the
> only committer on this repository.
You may be the only committer, but are you committing from only one checked
out tree? Or did you do anything unusual on the checkout or update?
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
address@hidden and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen