info-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: edit -c companion patch?


From: Noel L Yap
Subject: Re: edit -c companion patch?
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 10:07:30 -0500

RCVS was setup due to the stagnation of CVS development.  It was branched off of
CVS-1.10.8.

Now that CVS development has started again, there probably won't be too much
activity at RCVS.  However, some of the patches contributed to RC VS (eg the
"reserved" locks patches) have not been introduced into CVS.  So, if you want
those patches, you'll have to install them yourself.  This shouldn't be too
difficult:
Start with a copy of cvs-1.10.8.  Import this into a CVS repository.  Install
the patches (man patch for more info).  Check them in.  Import the latest
version of CVS.  Perform a merge.

I haven't done this myself so the steps above may be a bit flaky.

Sorry I can't help any more than this,
Noel




address@hidden on 2000.11.24 07:34:36

To:   address@hidden
cc:   address@hidden
Subject:  Re: edit -c companion patch?




Noel L Yap wrote:
>
> All these patches (and more!) are availabe at SourceForge under the project
> RCVS.
>
RCVS looks dead (the last checkin was 7 months ago according to the web
view).  What is the URL for the up to date version?

Tony

--

"If a system is of sufficient complexity, it will be built before it is
designed, implemented before it is tested and outdated before it is
debugged." - McAuley's
Axiom

address@hidden





This communication is for informational purposes only.  It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]