[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update
From: |
Mike Castle |
Subject: |
Re: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Aug 2001 11:08:07 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.18i |
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 09:40:54AM -0400, Alleman, Lowell wrote:
> I know that I could keep the copy in sync on the NT side using scripts, but
> I would much rather do this on the Linux side. NT has no built in scripting
> functionality (or none that I'm familiar with beyond the pathetic "batch
> files"), and I'm not going to suggest installing Perl or any thing else
You should, perhaps, revisit the scripting capabilities of NT.
It is *nearly* as powerful as Bourne.
Granted, it's not pretty. But most of the capabilities ARE there.
Btw, I'm a unix/linux bigot saying this.
mrc
--
Mike Castle address@hidden www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc
- Re: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update, Mike Castle, 2001/08/01
- Re: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update, Greg A. Woods, 2001/08/01
- RE: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update, Alleman, Lowell, 2001/08/01
- RE: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update, Kostur, Andre, 2001/08/01
- RE: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update, Thornley, David, 2001/08/01
- Re: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update, Rex_Jolliff, 2001/08/01
- RE: Forcing DOS line endings on checkout/update, Thornley, David, 2001/08/01