[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: File permissions
From: |
Tobias Brox |
Subject: |
Re: File permissions |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Sep 2001 01:00:36 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.0.1i |
[Greg A. Woods - Tue at 03:47:57PM -0400]
> There's no way to handle _any_ file attribute change tracking without
> extending the RCS file format. Period.
When PreservePermission is set, the information is actually written to the
RCS files. Is this a gross hack? Does it break up RCS somehow?
> Take it up with the RCS maintainers if you want to do something productive
> about it.
Is RCS still beeing developed at all?
I see no reason why the frame of the RCS file format should be a definite
blocker for what features there can be in CVS. After all, if RCS was
perfect, there would be no need for CVS?
Information that won't fit into the ,v-files can be stored elsewere. It
adds complexity, and that's undesireable - but it's certainly possible.
- File permissions, Tobias Brox, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions, Matt Riechers, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions, Greg A. Woods, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions,
Tobias Brox <=
- Re: File permissions, Paul Sander, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions, Larry Jones, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions, Greg A. Woods, 2001/09/26
- Re: File permissions, Tobias Brox, 2001/09/26
- Re: File permissions, Greg A. Woods, 2001/09/26
- Extending CVS without breaking RCS ,v files, Frederic Brehm, 2001/09/25
- Re: File permissions, Eric Siegerman, 2001/09/25