[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: refactoring when using CVS
From: |
Noel Yap |
Subject: |
Re: refactoring when using CVS |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Feb 2002 20:17:19 -0800 (PST) |
--- "Greg A. Woods" <address@hidden> wrote:
> [ On Saturday, February 23, 2002 at 05:15:51
> (-0800), Noel Yap wrote: ]
> > What??? Since when does "serial commits" mean
> "serial
> > development"? Can you please work with other
> people
> > within an XP project before making such comments?
> > Again, your thinking is completely contrary to
> > others', can you please explain this? Are we to
> > believe that the rest of the world is wrong while
> you
> > are right?
>
> www.extremeprogramming.org:
>
> Only one pair integrates code at a time.
So I ask again, "When does 'serial commit' mean
'serial development'?" Just because "only one pair
integrates code at a time", which to me means "only
one pair commits code at a time", doesn't mean that
concurrent development is occurring.
The rest of my questions have also not been answered.
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, (continued)
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
- Message not available
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Tom Plunket, 2002/02/21
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/21
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/22
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/23
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/24
- Re: refactoring when using CVS,
Noel Yap <=
- Re: refactoring when using CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/22
Re: refactoring when using CVS, Mark A. Flacy, 2002/02/21
Re: refactoring when using CVS, Mark A. Flacy, 2002/02/21
RE: refactoring when using CVS, Thornley, David, 2002/02/21
RE: refactoring when using CVS, Thornley, David, 2002/02/21