Re: OT: C++, yuck!

[Noel Yap]

--- "Mark A. Flacy" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas S Urban
> <address@hidden> writes:
> Thomas> 
> Thomas> On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:59:48 -0500, Greg
> A. Woods sent 2.8K bytes:
> >> "dynamic binding" isn't a feature you could ever
> possibly decide on
> >> needing up front for any kind of project you'd
> ever even get close to
> >> justifying C for!  Get real!
> Thomas> 
> Thomas> You're wrong. Read what I wrote again. 
> Projects I am working on satisfy
> Thomas> the description I gave.  Then again, I'm not
> real, but I'm working on
> Thomas> it.
> 
> In this case, he's correct.  After all, if you need
> dynamic binding, then
> you can't use C and therefore can't justify using it
> for said project.  :-)

Actually, I've used dynamic binding in C -- I just had
to create manually the vtbl's :-)

Noel

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Greetings - Send FREE e-cards for every occasion!
http://greetings.yahoo.com