[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎó
From: |
R P Herrold |
Subject: |
Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 18:00:47 -0400 (EDT) |
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Les Bell wrote:
> Before moderation, how about the simpler step of simply denying all posts
> by non-members? I can see no legitimate reason why a CVS user would want to
> post to the list and not receive replies.
Re-read my proposal --- that _was_ my approach <grin>
I have copied RMS (who seems able to get attention <grin>) on
poll results: 6 in favor, 0 opposed, 5 new pieces of spam at
the moment.
Will advise.
-- Russ
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Les Bell, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê,
R P Herrold <=
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Terry Spafford, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing th e list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåe ÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Thomas S. Urban, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Adam P., 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN·½Ê, Joi Ellis, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB2312] eQN, Robert J. Clark, 2002/04/08
- Re: PROPOSAL: Addressing the list's spam issue: was: [GB23 12] ±ÜÃâåeÎóµÄÍâÙQÐÐäN· ½Ê, Brian Poynor, 2002/04/08