[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: cvs add <directory>
From: |
Greg A. Woods |
Subject: |
RE: cvs add <directory> |
Date: |
Sat, 24 May 2003 14:28:51 -0400 (EDT) |
[ On Friday, May 23, 2003 at 22:02:55 (-0700), Paul Sander wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: cvs add <directory>
>
> Your claim is not correct. Directories CAN be versioned, even using an
> underlying shared, file-based repository system, even if it uses RCS.
OK, yes, directories can be versioned.
However directories cannot possibly ever be versioned with any
meaningful and useful result in any system even remotely like CVS. It
is simply not conceptually or logically possible. If you think so then
you are very confused. There is simply nothing there that needs to be
"versioned". Anything you think you see is a figment of your imagination.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>
- Re: cvs add <directory>, (continued)
- Re: cvs add <directory>, Phil R Lawrence, 2003/05/23
- Re: cvs add <directory>, Donald Sharp, 2003/05/23
- Re: cvs add <directory>, Greg A. Woods, 2003/05/23
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Shankar Unni, 2003/05/23
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Paul Sander, 2003/05/23
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Greg A. Woods, 2003/05/23
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Paul Sander, 2003/05/24
- RE: cvs add <directory>,
Greg A. Woods <=
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Shankar Unni, 2003/05/24
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Greg A. Woods, 2003/05/24
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Paul Sander, 2003/05/25
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Greg A. Woods, 2003/05/25
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Paul Sander, 2003/05/26
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Greg A. Woods, 2003/05/26
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Paul Sander, 2003/05/27
- RE: cvs add <directory>, Greg A. Woods, 2003/05/27
- Re: cvs add <directory>, Kaz Kylheku, 2003/05/28
- Re: merging changes...., Greg A. Woods, 2003/05/28