[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Checkout's over checkouts.
From: |
Euan Guttridge |
Subject: |
RE: Checkout's over checkouts. |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 18:22:24 +0100 |
Of course, excellent solution - and simple.
Just needed to add the '-F' to apply the consolidated tag to subsequent
tagged versions.
cvs rtag -rbranchname consolidated-tag module
cvs rtag -F -rtag1 consolidated-tag module
cvs rtag -F -rtag2 consolidated-tag module
cvs co -j HEAD -j consolidated-tag module
[sanity check]
cvs commit -m 'blah' module
Thanks..
Euan
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim.Hyslop [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 30 March 2005 17:20
To: 'Euan Guttridge'; Jim.Hyslop; address@hidden
Subject: RE: Checkout's over checkouts.
Euan Guttridge wrote:
> The problem with doing that, which in fact also applies to my (bad)
> suggestion, is that this will 'schedule for removal' all
> files in HEAD not
> in tag1.
Oh, right, missed that. You still don't need the extra tags and branches
though:
cvs rtag -rtag1 consolidated-tag module
cvs rtag -rtag2 consolidated-tag module
(etc.)
cvs update -A
cvs up -jconsolidated-tag -jHEAD
--
Jim Hyslop
Senior Software Designer
Leitch Technology International Inc. ( http://www.leitch.com )
Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal ( http://www.cuj.com/experts )
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., (continued)
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Jim.Hyslop, 2005/03/29
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Euan Guttridge, 2005/03/29
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Jim.Hyslop, 2005/03/29
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Euan Guttridge, 2005/03/30
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Jim.Hyslop, 2005/03/30
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Euan Guttridge, 2005/03/30
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Jim.Hyslop, 2005/03/30
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Euan Guttridge, 2005/03/30
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts., Jim.Hyslop, 2005/03/30
- RE: Checkout's over checkouts.,
Euan Guttridge <=